Peter Dutton, the leader of the opposition, has made references to bringing back the Significant Investor Visa (SIV), sometimes referred to as the "golden ticket" visa.
In January of last year, the Albanese government abandoned this scheme, which had cost $5 million. The decision stemmed from worries that criminals, dishonest public servants, and even spies could use the visa as a backdoor to citizenship.
A video of Dutton talking about the potential return of the visa recently came to light. His chat with migration agent Min Li is captured on the video, which was posted on the Chinese social media site RedNote.
While admitting that a revision could be required, Dutton said in the video, "I think we'll bring it back." He said that changes would probably be made if the Coalition returned to power.
Social Services Minister Amanda Rishworth was eager to point out what she called inconsistencies in Dutton's immigration policy. She said that he regularly changed his stance to fit political narratives.
She claimed that Peter Dutton talks a lot about migration. "But he doesn't measure up when it counts." He had previously opposed a cap on the number of overseas students after being pressured by lobbyists, she noted. He now seems prepared to reinstate a visa that Labor got rid of.
Rishworth claims that when Dutton was in control, he left Australia's migration system in disarray. He has no clear plan, she said, as seen by his recent comments.
Jane Hume, the Shadow Finance Minister, defended Dutton's remarks, nevertheless. She underlined that only roughly 300 persons received the SIV each year and that it was crucial for investment, especially in housing projects.
Hume pointed out that "this visa is still available under Labor." "We will announce a comprehensive migration policy before the election, but it may need to be rebalanced."
Additionally, she accused the government of running an "out-of-control" immigration scheme. In the past two years, a million additional migrants have come. There will shortly be another 1.5 million. This cannot continue.
The Coalition previously committed to reducing net foreign migration from a record 510,000 to approximately 160,000. However, Dutton was hesitant to reiterate this goal in December. Instead, he pledged to cut Australia's intake of permanent migrants from 185,000 to 140,000, which would rise to 160,000 over two years.
The Coalition has also discussed rebalancing immigration to prioritize infrastructure and economic expansion. Hume emphasized that migration should boost output rather than pressure resources.
Dutton's most recent remarks regarding the investor visa have stoked discussion over the Coalition's actual immigration policy. His ideas will be scrutinized as the next federal election draws near.
Dutton alluded to reintroducing the visa in a private discussion that was caught on camera. The program may require a revamp, he said. His comments suggest that a new framework would give careful thought to any comeback.
Investor visas are available in many countries with different conditions. Some have more stringent regulations and thorough background investigations. To minimize risks and draw in high-quality investment, Australia's updated program may seek to adhere to international norms.